# DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Llama 13b

> DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v3-2-speciale-vs-llama-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads 46.1 to 13.9.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 39.1 | 23.9 |
| Rank | 159 | 344 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.58 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.68 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 39.9 (#136)
- Llama 13b: 20.9 (#332)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 46.7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 683 |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.1 (#65)
- Llama 13b: 13.4 (#327)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| SimpleBench | 52.6% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 728 |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 100.09 |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |

## Math

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
- Llama 13b: 24.4 (#259)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 838 |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| MMLU | — | 47.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |

## Multimodal

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
- Llama 13b: 16.8 (#292)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 819 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
- Llama 13b: 36.9 (#300)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 781 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.1 (#217)
- Llama 13b: 13.9 (#307)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 794 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1276 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 753 |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than Llama 13b?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.1 to 23.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Llama 13b better for coding?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 20.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Llama 13b share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.