# DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Grok 4 Fast

> DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Grok 4 Fast score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.7 vs 39.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v3-2-speciale-vs-grok-4-fast
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher in 2 categories and Grok 4 Fast in 1 category; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Grok 4 Fast leads 60.0 to 46.0.
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 39.7 | 39.4 |
| Rank | 162 | 167 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.58 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.68 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 40.4 (#140)
- Grok 4 Fast: 32.5 (#271)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 46.7% | 42.9% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1159 |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1429 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
- Grok 4 Fast: 29.5 (#86)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 15.7% |
| Cybench | — | 30% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1171 |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.9 (#73)
- Grok 4 Fast: 22.2 (#201)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 5.3% |
| SimpleBench | 52.6% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 66.1% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 48.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1412 |
| DTBench | — | 82.7% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 144.2 |
| ForecastBench | — | 60.5 |

## Math

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
- Grok 4 Fast: 38.9 (#123)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1419 |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
- Grok 4 Fast: 32.0 (#214)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 19.7% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1411 |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
- Grok 4 Fast: 51.3 (#111)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1396 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1457 |
| LMArena French | — | 1431 |
| LMArena German | — | 1383 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1352 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1357 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1389 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1415 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
- Grok 4 Fast: 73.2 (#121)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1387 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
- Grok 4 Fast: 63.2 (#3)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 94.4% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1415 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.0 (#222)
- Grok 4 Fast: 60.0 (#102)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Grok 4 Fast |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1407 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1387 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1276 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1414 |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than Grok 4 Fast?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Grok 4 Fast score almost the same on the Noometry Index (39.7 vs 39.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Grok 4 Fast better for coding?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 32.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Grok 4 Fast share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4 Fast has 30.