# DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale vs Grok-3 mini

> Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v3-2-speciale-vs-grok-3-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale scores higher in 1 category and Grok-3 mini in 2 categories; 2 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale leads 32.9 to 13.6.
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 39.7 | 41.2 |
| Rank | 162 | 141 |
| Context | 128K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.58 | — |
| Output $/M | $1.68 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 40.4 (#140)
- Grok-3 mini: 40.8 (#131)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| WeirdML | 46.7% | 42.6% |
| Aider Polyglot | — | 49.3% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1379 |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 32.9 (#73)
- Grok-3 mini: 13.6 (#334)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 0.4% |
| SimpleBench | 52.6% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 61.3% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 16.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1375 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 140.35 |

## Math

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
- Grok-3 mini: 42.1 (#85)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 77.8% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 31.8% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1386 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 90.9% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 5.9% |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
- Grok-3 mini: 46.4 (#81)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 76.3% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 79.9% |
| Confabulations | — | 10.8% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 67.5% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1395 |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
- Grok-3 mini: 48.1 (#145)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1352 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1387 |
| LMArena French | — | 1357 |
| LMArena German | — | 1349 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1342 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1335 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1353 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1381 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
- Grok-3 mini: 78.5 (#9)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 95.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1357 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: —
- Grok-3 mini: 41.0 (#147)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 66.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1372 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale: 46.0 (#222)
- Grok-3 mini: 52.5 (#169)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale | Grok-3 mini |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1370 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1342 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | — | 73.5% |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1276 | — |
| WildBench | — | 65.1% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1355 |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale better than Grok-3 mini?

Grok-3 mini is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.2 to 39.7 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale or Grok-3 mini better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (40.4 vs 40.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale and Grok-3 mini share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Speciale has 3 scored results on Noometry and Grok-3 mini has 35.