# DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp vs GPT-5.6 Sol

> GPT-5.6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.0 to 44.3 on the Noometry Index. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp costs 28× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.6 Sol's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v3-2-exp-vs-gpt-5-6-sol
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 36

## Summary

- They share 36 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp scores higher in 1 category and GPT-5.6 Sol in 8 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where GPT-5.6 Sol leads 74.8 to 22.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is ARC-AGI-2: 4% for DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp and 92.5% for GPT-5.6 Sol.
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is cheaper at $0.26 / $0.38 per million input/output tokens, against $4 / $20 for GPT-5.6 Sol.
- GPT-5.6 Sol accepts more context: 1.05M tokens versus 164K.
- DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | OpenAI |
| Noometry Index | 44.3 | 65.0 |
| Rank | 78 | 7 |
| Context | 164K | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | $0.26 | $4 |
| Output $/M | $0.38 | $20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 46.5 (#65)
- GPT-5.6 Sol: 65.1 (#7)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena WebDev | 1362 | 1618 |
| SciCode | 38.9% | 57.1% |
| WeirdML | 39.5% | 89.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1454 | 1498 |
| DeepSWE | — | 72.7% |
| FrontierCode | — | 47.5% |
| SWE-bench Verified (bash only) | 70% | — |
| Aider Polyglot | 74.2% | — |
| CursorBench | — | 41.7% |
| SWE-bench Multilingual | 59% | — |
| FrontierSWE | — | 32.2% |
| GSO | — | 76.5% |
| MirrorCode | — | 20% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 2,177 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 32.7 (#59)
- GPT-5.6 Sol: 50.3 (#7)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | 21.3% | 51.4% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | 1,034 | 9,619 |
| Terminal-Bench | 39.6% | — |
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | 56.7% | — |
| OSWorld 2.0 | — | 27.3% |
| TheAgentCompany | 42.9% | — |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 46.9% |
| PostTrainBench | — | 36.2% |
| BALROG | — | 60% |
| GBAEval | — | 52.6% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 30.7% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1257 |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 22.1 (#208)
- GPT-5.6 Sol: 74.8 (#8)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| ARC-AGI-2 | 4% | 92.5% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 52.2% | 67% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | 36.7% | 93.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 57% | 97.5% |
| CritPt | 2.9% | 32.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | 14% | 64% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1434 | 1484 |
| DTBench | 87.7% | 96% |
| LMCA | 29.1% | 59.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 146.27 | 161.66 |
| SimpleBench | — | 71.7% |
| EnigmaEval | — | 37.1% |
| Thematic Generalization | 65% | — |
| EBR-Bench | — | 44.8% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 58% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 93.1% |
| Bench to the Future 3 | — | 0.14 |

## Math

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 41.7 (#87)
- GPT-5.6 Sol: 85.6 (#9)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 87.8% | 100% |
| ProofBench | 8% | 83% |
| LMArena Math | 1435 | 1474 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 89.1% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 82.9% |
| MathArena Final-Answer Competitions | 57.7% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | 22.1% | — |
| FrontierMath Erdős | — | 0% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | 2.1% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 51.7 (#66)
- GPT-5.6 Sol: 64.3 (#18)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 83.4% | 93.5% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 5.3% | 12.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1436 | 1516 |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 69.7% |

## Multimodal

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: —
- GPT-5.6 Sol: 48.6 (#9)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1281 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 33.6% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 56.7% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1483 |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 52.2 (#90)
- GPT-5.6 Sol: 55.3 (#32)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1409 | 1452 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1461 | 1527 |
| LMArena French | 1433 | 1477 |
| LMArena German | 1440 | 1476 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1374 | 1471 |
| LMArena Korean | 1371 | 1442 |
| LMArena Russian | 1424 | 1468 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1440 | 1441 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 74.5 (#93)
- GPT-5.6 Sol: 77.7 (#16)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1413 | 1482 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 47.6 (#16)
- GPT-5.6 Sol: 45.4 (#42)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1428 | 1480 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 83.3% | — |
| CL-bench | 13.2% | — |
| CL-bench Life | 9.5% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp: 62.4 (#77)
- GPT-5.6 Sol: 73.3 (#12)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp | GPT-5.6 Sol |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1425 | 1457 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1403 | 1448 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1515 | 1972 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1427 | 1460 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1250 |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp better than GPT-5.6 Sol?

GPT-5.6 Sol is the stronger model overall, scoring 65.0 to 44.3 on the Noometry Index. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp costs 28× less per token, which makes it the better buy when GPT-5.6 Sol's lead doesn't matter for your workload.

### Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp or GPT-5.6 Sol?

DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp is cheaper. It lists at $0.26 per million input tokens and $0.38 per million output tokens; GPT-5.6 Sol lists at $4 and $20.

### Is DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp or GPT-5.6 Sol better for coding?

GPT-5.6 Sol scores higher on coding benchmarks: 65.1 versus 46.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

GPT-5.6 Sol does, with 1.05M tokens against 164K.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp and GPT-5.6 Sol share?

36 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.2-Exp has 49 scored results on Noometry and GPT-5.6 Sol has 65.