# DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus vs Ring-2.6-1T

> DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus has enough public results to be ranked (#96); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v3-1-terminus-vs-ring-2-6-1t
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus scores higher in 2 categories and Ring-2.6-1T in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Ant Group (inclusionAI) |
| Noometry Index | 42.6 | 36.3 |
| Rank | 96 | — |
| Context | 164K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $1 | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 41.5 (#114)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 40.1

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 40.6% | 42.4% |
| ALE-Bench | 745.17 | 432.57 |
| LMArena Coding | 1426 | — |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 25.7 (#126)
- Ring-2.6-1T: 25.3

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 1.7% | 3.7% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 57.4% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1427 | — |
| DTBench | 81.3% | — |
| LMCA | 28.6% | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 35.7 (#138)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1402 | — |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 52.3 (#87)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1407 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | — |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 74.4 (#96)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | — |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 43.5 (#88)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1426 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 61.3 (#87)
- Ring-2.6-1T: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Ring-2.6-1T |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1404 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1411 | — |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus better than Ring-2.6-1T?

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus has enough public results to be ranked (#96); Ring-2.6-1T does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus or Ring-2.6-1T better for coding?

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.5 versus 40.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and Ring-2.6-1T share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus has 16 scored results on Noometry and Ring-2.6-1T has 3.