# DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus vs Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13

> DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v3-1-terminus-vs-grok-2-mini
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus scores higher in 7 categories and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 in 0 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus leads 61.3 to 47.5.
- DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 42.6 | 37.0 |
| Rank | 96 | 196 |
| Context | 164K | — |
| Input $/M | $0.30 | — |
| Output $/M | $1 | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 41.5 (#114)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 36.4 (#194)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1426 | 1269 |
| SciCode | 40.6% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 745.17 | — |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 25.7 (#126)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 23.7 (#162)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1427 | 1255 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 57.4% | — |
| CritPt | 1.7% | — |
| DTBench | 81.3% | — |
| LMCA | 28.6% | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 35.7 (#138)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 32.8 (#185)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1402 | 1265 |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: —
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 33.4 (#195)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1238 |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 52.3 (#87)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 41.6 (#203)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1407 | 1257 |
| LMArena Russian | 1434 | 1261 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1262 |
| LMArena French | — | 1285 |
| LMArena German | — | 1273 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1213 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1195 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1278 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 74.4 (#96)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 65.7 (#215)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1406 | 1245 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 43.5 (#88)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 38.4 (#191)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1426 | 1267 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 61.3 (#87)
- Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13: 47.5 (#207)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1420 | 1281 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1404 | 1242 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1411 | 1265 |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus better than Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13?

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus is the stronger model overall, scoring 42.6 to 37.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus or Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 better for coding?

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 41.5 versus 36.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus has 16 scored results on Noometry and Grok 2 Mini 2024 08 13 has 17.