# DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus vs Gemma 4 31B IT

> DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and Gemma 4 31B IT score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.1 vs 43.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v3-1-terminus-vs-gemma-4-31b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 16

## Summary

- They share 16 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus scores higher in 1 category and Gemma 4 31B IT in 6 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 4 31B IT leads 43.2 to 38.5.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is LMCA: 28.6% for DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and 39.3% for Gemma 4 31B IT.
- Gemma 4 31B IT is cheaper at $0.09 / $0.34 per million input/output tokens, against $0.27 / $1 for DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus.
- Gemma 4 31B IT accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 164K.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Google |
| Noometry Index | 43.1 | 43.5 |
| Rank | 97 | 90 |
| Context | 164K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.27 | $0.09 |
| Output $/M | $1 | $0.34 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 42.0 (#113)
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 42.3 (#108)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 40.6% | 43.4% |
| LMArena Coding | 1426 | 1459 |
| ALE-Bench | 745.17 | 925.5 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1366 |
| WeirdML | — | 52.3% |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 26.4 (#133)
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 27.2 (#122)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 57.4% | 63.5% |
| CritPt | 1.7% | 1.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1426 | 1448 |
| DTBench | 81.3% | 82.7% |
| LMCA | 28.6% | 39.3% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 70.6% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 5% |
| Thematic Generalization | — | 53% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 30.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 142.74 |

## Math

- DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 38.5 (#137)
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 43.2 (#81)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1402 | 1465 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 73.3% |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: —
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 37.9 (#151)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 75.8% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 10.4% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 7.4% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1465 |

## Multimodal

- DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: —
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 41.6 (#34)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1277 |
| LMArena Document | — | 1425 |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 52.1 (#92)
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 53.8 (#57)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1407 | 1431 |
| LMArena Russian | 1436 | 1460 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1476 |
| LMArena French | — | 1435 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1444 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 74.0 (#106)
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 75.5 (#61)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1404 | 1433 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 43.4 (#97)
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 44.2 (#71)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1421 | 1446 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus: 61.0 (#92)
- Gemma 4 31B IT: 60.5 (#96)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus | Gemma 4 31B IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1419 | 1443 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1403 | 1415 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1411 | 1452 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1368 |
| EQ-Bench 4 | — | 1120 |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus better than Gemma 4 31B IT?

DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and Gemma 4 31B IT score almost the same on the Noometry Index (43.1 vs 43.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus or Gemma 4 31B IT?

Gemma 4 31B IT is cheaper. It lists at $0.09 per million input tokens and $0.34 per million output tokens; DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus lists at $0.27 and $1.

### Is DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus or Gemma 4 31B IT better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (42.0 vs 42.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Gemma 4 31B IT does, with 262K tokens against 164K.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus and Gemma 4 31B IT share?

16 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V3.1-Terminus has 16 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 4 31B IT has 35.