# DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B

> OLMo 2 Furious 13B has enough public results to be ranked (#301); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v2-vs-olmo-2-furious-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) leads 39.8 to 28.1.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 39.7 | 29.2 |
| Rank | — | 301 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): 39.8 (#141)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.1 (#309)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.9% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.4% | — |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 14.8 (#312)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | 78.8% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 124.78 | — |
| HellaSwag | 87.1% | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
| PIQA | 83.9% | — |
| WinoGrande | 86.3% | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 21.3 (#270)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.0 (#278)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 92.2% | — |
| MMLU | 78.4% | — |
| TriviaQA | 80% | — |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 61.1 (#243)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024): —
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 43.0 (#226)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?

OLMo 2 Furious 13B has enough public results to be ranked (#301); DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?

DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.8 versus 28.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2 (MoE-236B, May 2024) has 10 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.