# DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) vs MiMo-V2-Flash

> MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-v2-5-vs-mimo-v2-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) scores higher in 1 category and MiMo-V2-Flash in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 59.7 to 49.8.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 200 | 138 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 31.7 (#281)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1309 | 1443 |
| Aider Polyglot | 17.8% | — |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.6% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 53.2% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |
| HumanEval+ | 83.5% | — |
| MBPP+ | 74.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 25.6 (#145)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1289 | 1420 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |

## Math

- DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 35.9 (#177)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1288 | 1396 |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 34.8 (#193)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1266 | 1425 |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 42.5 (#193)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1273 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1318 | 1462 |
| LMArena French | 1289 | 1429 |
| LMArena German | 1258 | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1228 | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | 1209 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | 1289 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1248 | 1420 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 67.5 (#194)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1280 | 1392 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 39.5 (#174)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1301 | 1409 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024): 49.8 (#187)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1294 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1285 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1297 | 1404 |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 37.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 31.7 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-V2.5 (Sep 2024) has 22 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.