# DeepSeek-R1 vs Nemotron 3 Ultra

> DeepSeek-R1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.3 vs 42.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-r1-vs-nemotron-3-ultra
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 23

## Summary

- They share 23 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek-R1 scores higher in 4 categories and Nemotron 3 Ultra in 5 categories; 9 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in reasoning, where Nemotron 3 Ultra leads 31.0 to 18.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 66.4% for DeepSeek-R1 and 86.7% for Nemotron 3 Ultra.
- Both cost about the same: $0.50 input and $2.15 output per million tokens.
- Nemotron 3 Ultra accepts more context: 262K tokens versus 164K.
- Nemotron 3 Ultra has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek-R1 | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 42.3 | 42.5 |
| Rank | 115 | 113 |
| Context | 164K | 262K |
| Input $/M | $0.50 | $0.50 |
| Output $/M | $2.15 | $2.20 |
| Weights | Proprietary | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek-R1: 46.3 (#68)
- Nemotron 3 Ultra: 38.1 (#182)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1 | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | 35.7% | 40.3% |
| WeirdML | 41.6% | 43.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1427 | 1468 |
| FrontierCode | — | 13.6% |
| Aider Polyglot | 71.4% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | 66.7% | — |
| ALE-Bench | 804.12 | — |
| AlgoTune | 1.7 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- DeepSeek-R1: 30.7 (#75)
- Nemotron 3 Ultra: 23.4 (#126)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1 | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 22.7% |
| DeepResearch Bench | 35.1% | — |
| BALROG | 34.9% | — |
| METR Time Horizons | 53.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek-R1: 18.6 (#278)
- Nemotron 3 Ultra: 31.0 (#82)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1 | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | 1.1% | 3.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1416 | 1452 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 141.29 | 146.17 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | 1.3% | — |
| SimpleBench | 40.8% | — |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | 69.4% | — |
| ARC-AGI-1 | 21.2% | — |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 12% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | 83.2% | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 20% |
| DTBench | — | 90.1% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | 69.8% | — |
| LMCA | — | 36.9% |
| ForecastBench | 60 | — |
| LiveBench | 71.6% | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek-R1: 43.8 (#79)
- Nemotron 3 Ultra: 35.3 (#187)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1 | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 66.4% | 86.7% |
| LMArena Math | 1400 | 1457 |
| ProofBench | — | 2% |
| Omni-MATH | 42.4% | — |
| LiveBench Math | 80.7% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 96.6% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek-R1: 44.5 (#87)
- Nemotron 3 Ultra: 52.5 (#61)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1 | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 76.3% | 85.4% |
| LMArena Expert | 1394 | 1472 |
| MMLU-Pro | 79.3% | — |
| Confabulations | 12.7% | — |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | 11.3% | — |
| GPQA (HELM) | 66.6% | — |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek-R1: 52.4 (#85)
- Nemotron 3 Ultra: 53.5 (#64)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1 | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1412 | 1427 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1442 | 1497 |
| LMArena French | 1417 | 1472 |
| LMArena German | 1404 | 1471 |
| LMArena Korean | 1360 | 1386 |
| LMArena Russian | 1423 | 1417 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1411 | 1454 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1391 | — |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek-R1: 72.0 (#143)
- Nemotron 3 Ultra: 74.7 (#88)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1 | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1382 | 1418 |
| LiveBench Instruction Following | 80.5% | — |
| IFEval | 78.4% | — |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek-R1: 45.4 (#36)
- Nemotron 3 Ultra: 43.9 (#81)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1 | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1391 | 1437 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | 75% | — |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek-R1: 61.4 (#88)
- Nemotron 3 Ultra: 66.3 (#36)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1 | Nemotron 3 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1428 | 1445 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1405 | 1398 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | 1500 | 1692 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1405 | 1411 |
| Short-Story Creative Writing | 83% | — |
| WildBench | 82.8% | — |
| LiveBench Language | 48.5% | — |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek-R1 better than Nemotron 3 Ultra?

DeepSeek-R1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra score almost the same on the Noometry Index (42.3 vs 42.5), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Which is cheaper, DeepSeek-R1 or Nemotron 3 Ultra?

DeepSeek-R1 is cheaper. It lists at $0.50 per million input tokens and $2.15 per million output tokens; Nemotron 3 Ultra lists at $0.50 and $2.20.

### Is DeepSeek-R1 or Nemotron 3 Ultra better for coding?

DeepSeek-R1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 46.3 versus 38.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### Which has the bigger context window?

Nemotron 3 Ultra does, with 262K tokens against 164K.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-R1 and Nemotron 3 Ultra share?

23 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-R1 has 52 scored results on Noometry and Nemotron 3 Ultra has 30.