# DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B vs Wizardlm 13b

> Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 26.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-r1-distill-qwen-1-5b-vs-wizardlm-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Wizardlm 13b leads 30.1 to 21.8.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 26.1 | 31.4 |
| Rank | 339 | 274 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B: 21.8 (#336)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.1 (#298)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 7% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1035 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 7.9% | — |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B: 19.2 (#262)
- Wizardlm 13b: 19.4 (#259)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1018 |

## Math

- DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B: 23.0 (#274)
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.2 (#238)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 21.4% | — |
| LMArena Math | — | 1017 |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B: 16.0 (#290)
- Wizardlm 13b: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 33.6% | — |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B: —
- Wizardlm 13b: 27.1 (#277)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1034 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1023 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B: —
- Wizardlm 13b: 53.5 (#285)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1048 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B: —
- Wizardlm 13b: 32.0 (#273)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1054 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B: —
- Wizardlm 13b: 30.5 (#287)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B | Wizardlm 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1077 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1091 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1047 |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B better than Wizardlm 13b?

Wizardlm 13b is the stronger model overall, scoring 31.4 to 26.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B or Wizardlm 13b better for coding?

Wizardlm 13b scores higher on coding benchmarks: 30.1 versus 21.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B and Wizardlm 13b share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek-R1-Distill-Qwen-1.5B has 5 scored results on Noometry and Wizardlm 13b has 10.