# DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Step 3

> Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-llm-67b-vs-step-3
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and Step 3 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Step 3 leads 36.2 to 7.1.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | StepFun |
| Noometry Index | 24.8 | 39.9 |
| Rank | 341 | 145 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.3 (#273)
- Step 3: 39.5 (#144)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | 1367 |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 15.9 (#300)
- Step 3: 27.6 (#102)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | 1355 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 62.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.54 | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.1 (#318)
- Step 3: 34.9 (#148)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1108 | 1366 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.1 (#308)
- Step 3: 36.2 (#161)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1333 |

## Multimodal

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: —
- Step 3: 34.9 (#81)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1176 |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.5 (#262)
- Step 3: 46.5 (#154)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | 1327 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1396 |
| LMArena German | — | 1371 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1271 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1331 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1372 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.7 (#272)
- Step 3: 70.6 (#159)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | 1332 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#260)
- Step 3: 40.3 (#152)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | 1326 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.8 (#277)
- Step 3: 54.5 (#146)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Step 3 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | 1351 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | 1322 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | 1340 |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Step 3?

Step 3 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.9 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Step 3 better for coding?

Step 3 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.5 versus 31.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Step 3 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Step 3 has 17.
