# DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Qwen3 8B

> Qwen3 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-llm-67b-vs-qwen3-8b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3 8B in 5 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3 8B leads 36.1 to 7.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 0.8% for DeepSeek LLM 67B and 56.1% for Qwen3 8B.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 24.8 | 33.3 |
| Rank | 341 | 237 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.18 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.3 (#273)
- Qwen3 8B: 33.4 (#245)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 22.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: —
- Qwen3 8B: 29.9 (#71)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Berkeley Function Calling Leaderboard | — | 42.6% |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 15.9 (#300)
- Qwen3 8B: 16.1 (#299)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 5% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.54 | 136.17 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | — |
| DTBench | — | 59.7% |
| LMCA | — | 8.8% |

## Math

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.1 (#318)
- Qwen3 8B: 33.3 (#176)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | 56.1% |
| LMArena Math | 1108 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.1 (#308)
- Qwen3 8B: 36.1 (#164)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | 56.8% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 4.8% |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.5 (#262)
- Qwen3 8B: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.7 (#272)
- Qwen3 8B: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | — |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#260)
- Qwen3 8B: 37.8 (#205)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 62.1% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.8 (#277)
- Qwen3 8B: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | — |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Qwen3 8B?

Qwen3 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.3 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Qwen3 8B better for coding?

Qwen3 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.4 versus 31.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Qwen3 8B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3 8B has 11.