# DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Qwen3.6 Flash

> Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-llm-67b-vs-qwen3-6-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen3.6 Flash in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Qwen3.6 Flash leads 42.1 to 7.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025: 0.8% for DeepSeek LLM 67B and 84.4% for Qwen3.6 Flash.
- DeepSeek LLM 67B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 38.8 |
| Rank | 347 | 182 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.19 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.13 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 326.4 |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 29.0 (#96)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | 20% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.5 | 143.26 |
| SimpleBench | — | 35.2% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | — |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 18% |
| DTBench | — | 77.1% |
| LMCA | — | 31% |

## Math

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 39.0 (#117)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | 84.4% |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 22.5% |
| LMArena Math | 1108 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 10.3% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 (v1) | — | 0% |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: 42.1 (#100)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | 83.3% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 15.9% |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | — |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282)
- Qwen3.6 Flash: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen3.6 Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | — |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Qwen3.6 Flash?

Qwen3.6 Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.8 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Qwen3.6 Flash share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen3.6 Flash has 13.