# DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Qwen Plus

> Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-llm-67b-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and Qwen Plus in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen Plus leads 52.2 to 31.6.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 6.4% for DeepSeek LLM 67B and 65.3% for Qwen Plus.
- DeepSeek LLM 67B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 37.1 |
| Rank | 347 | 210 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278)
- Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | 1328 |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304)
- Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.5 | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324)
- Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | 17.8% |
| LMArena Math | 1108 | 1326 |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313)
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | 48.1% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1328 |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267)
- Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1323 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277)
- Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | 1303 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265)
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | 1324 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282)
- Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | 1336 |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Qwen Plus better for coding?

Qwen Plus scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.9 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Qwen Plus share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.