# DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Nova 2.0 Pro Preview

> Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.8 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-llm-67b-vs-nova-2-0-pro-preview
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where Nova 2.0 Pro Preview leads 40.2 to 31.3.
- DeepSeek LLM 67B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Amazon |
| Noometry Index | 24.8 | 32.8 |
| Rank | 341 | 241 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.3 (#273)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 40.2 (#130)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| SciCode | — | 42.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: —
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.9 (#127)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | — | 2% |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 15.9 (#300)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: 21.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.54 | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.1 (#318)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | — |
| LMArena Math | 1108 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.1 (#308)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | — |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.5 (#262)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.7 (#272)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | — |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#260)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.8 (#277)
- Nova 2.0 Pro Preview: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Nova 2.0 Pro Preview |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | — |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Nova 2.0 Pro Preview?

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview is the stronger model overall, scoring 32.8 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Nova 2.0 Pro Preview better for coding?

Nova 2.0 Pro Preview scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.2 versus 31.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Nova 2.0 Pro Preview has 3.