# DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Muse Glimmer

> Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-llm-67b-vs-muse-glimmer
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and Muse Glimmer in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Muse Glimmer leads 37.9 to 7.1.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 24.8 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 341 | 128 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.3 (#273)
- Muse Glimmer: 38.7 (#157)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | 1417 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1355 |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 15.9 (#300)
- Muse Glimmer: 27.2 (#111)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | 1395 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.54 | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.1 (#318)
- Muse Glimmer: 36.1 (#128)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1108 | 1419 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.1 (#308)
- Muse Glimmer: 37.9 (#140)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1388 |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.5 (#262)
- Muse Glimmer: 50.6 (#117)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | 1384 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1412 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1393 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.7 (#272)
- Muse Glimmer: 72.7 (#134)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | 1374 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#260)
- Muse Glimmer: 42.1 (#124)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | 1381 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.8 (#277)
- Muse Glimmer: 57.7 (#122)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Muse Glimmer |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | 1389 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | 1338 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | 1398 |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Muse Glimmer?

Muse Glimmer is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Muse Glimmer better for coding?

Muse Glimmer scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.7 versus 31.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Muse Glimmer share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Muse Glimmer has 13.