# DeepSeek LLM 67B vs MiMo-V2-Flash

> MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-llm-67b-vs-mimo-v2-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2-Flash in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where MiMo-V2-Flash leads 39.7 to 7.0.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek LLM 67B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 41.3 |
| Rank | 347 | 138 |
| Context | — | 262K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 36.1 (#211)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | 1443 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1330 |
| SciCode | — | 25.9% |
| ALE-Bench | — | 737.95 |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 24.9 (#157)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | 1420 |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.5 | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 38.3 (#139)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1108 | 1396 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 39.7 (#131)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1425 |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 51.0 (#113)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | 1392 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1462 |
| LMArena French | — | 1429 |
| LMArena German | — | 1395 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1325 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1420 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 73.5 (#120)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | 1392 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 43.0 (#110)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | 1409 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282)
- MiMo-V2-Flash: 59.7 (#106)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | MiMo-V2-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | 1411 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | 1375 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | 1404 |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than MiMo-V2-Flash?

MiMo-V2-Flash is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.3 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or MiMo-V2-Flash better for coding?

MiMo-V2-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.1 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and MiMo-V2-Flash share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2-Flash has 21.