# DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Llama 3.2 90B

> Llama 3.2 90B is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.5 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-llm-67b-vs-llama-3-2-90b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and Llama 3.2 90B in 3 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Llama 3.2 90B leads 21.7 to 7.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 6.4% for DeepSeek LLM 67B and 39.4% for Llama 3.2 90B.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 27.5 |
| Rank | 347 | 331 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: —
- Llama 3.2 90B: 30.0 (#80)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 27.3% |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#217)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.5 | 125.5 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.4% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 11.1 (#308)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | 2.6% |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | 39.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1108 | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313)
- Llama 3.2 90B: 21.7 (#274)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | 41% |
| MMLU | — | 80.3% |

## Multimodal

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: —
- Llama 3.2 90B: 25.4 (#124)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1000 |
| GeoBench | — | 52% |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | — |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282)
- Llama 3.2 90B: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Llama 3.2 90B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | — |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Llama 3.2 90B?

Llama 3.2 90B is the stronger model overall, scoring 27.5 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Llama 3.2 90B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.2 90B has 9.