# DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Llama 13b

> DeepSeek LLM 67B and Llama 13b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (24.9 vs 24.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-llm-67b-vs-llama-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 5 categories and Llama 13b in 1 category; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in instruction following, where DeepSeek LLM 67B leads 55.4 to 36.7.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 24.4 |
| Rank | 347 | 348 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278)
- Llama 13b: 21.4 (#337)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | 683 |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304)
- Llama 13b: 14.0 (#329)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | 728 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.5 | 100.58 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 37.9% |
| HellaSwag | — | 79.2% |
| LAMBADA | — | 75.2% |
| PIQA | — | 80.1% |
| WinoGrande | — | 73% |

## Math

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324)
- Llama 13b: 26.7 (#256)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1108 | 838 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |
| GSM8K | — | 20.6% |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | — | 52.7% |
| BoolQ | — | 78.7% |
| MMLU | — | 47.7% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 56.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 77.9% |

## Multimodal

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: —
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| ScienceQA | — | 43.3% |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267)
- Llama 13b: 16.6 (#297)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | 819 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277)
- Llama 13b: 36.7 (#305)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | 781 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265)
- Llama 13b: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282)
- Llama 13b: 13.8 (#312)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Llama 13b |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | 834 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | 794 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | 753 |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Llama 13b?

DeepSeek LLM 67B and Llama 13b score almost the same on the Noometry Index (24.9 vs 24.4), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Llama 13b better for coding?

DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 31.9 versus 21.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Llama 13b share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Llama 13b has 21.