# DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Granite 4.0 H Small

> Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-llm-67b-vs-ibm-granite-h-small
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 4.0 H Small in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Granite 4.0 H Small leads 32.0 to 7.0.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 36.5 |
| Rank | 347 | 214 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 36.4 (#209)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | 1249 |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 24.4 (#163)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | 1240 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.5 | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 31.4 (#223)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1108 | 1247 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | — |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.6% |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 32.0 (#215)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | — |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 56.9% |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 5.2% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 38.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1251 |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 38.6 (#228)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | 1216 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1249 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1201 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1258 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 68.7 (#183)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | 1222 |
| IFEval | — | 89% |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 37.7 (#213)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | 1242 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282)
- Granite 4.0 H Small: 43.8 (#227)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Granite 4.0 H Small |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | 1241 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | 1211 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | 1242 |
| WildBench | — | 73.9% |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Granite 4.0 H Small?

Granite 4.0 H Small is the stronger model overall, scoring 36.5 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Granite 4.0 H Small better for coding?

Granite 4.0 H Small scores higher on coding benchmarks: 36.4 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Granite 4.0 H Small share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.0 H Small has 19.