# DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Hunyuan Turbo 0110

> Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-llm-67b-vs-hunyuan-turbo
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Hunyuan Turbo 0110 leads 35.6 to 8.7.
- DeepSeek LLM 67B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Tencent |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 39.6 |
| Rank | 347 | 163 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278)
- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 38.6 (#171)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | 1319 |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304)
- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 26.1 (#137)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | 1308 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.5 | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324)
- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 35.6 (#180)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1108 | 1273 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313)
- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | — |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267)
- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 43.3 (#184)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | 1285 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1358 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1305 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277)
- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 67.4 (#195)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | 1278 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265)
- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 39.8 (#168)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | 1309 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282)
- Hunyuan Turbo 0110: 50.2 (#183)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Hunyuan Turbo 0110 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | 1311 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | 1269 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | 1303 |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Hunyuan Turbo 0110?

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 is the stronger model overall, scoring 39.6 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Hunyuan Turbo 0110 better for coding?

Hunyuan Turbo 0110 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.6 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Hunyuan Turbo 0110 has 11.