# DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent

> Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-llm-67b-vs-grok-4-20-multi-agent
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent leads 39.7 to 7.1.
- DeepSeek LLM 67B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 24.8 | 45.5 |
| Rank | 341 | 62 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $1.25 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.50 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.3 (#273)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#91)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | 1458 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: —
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Search | — | 1204 |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 15.9 (#300)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 42.4 (#44)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | 1448 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 89.6% |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.54 | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.1 (#318)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 36.6 (#106)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1108 | 1441 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.1 (#308)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.7 (#116)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1445 |

## Multimodal

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: —
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 39.8 (#44)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1259 |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.5 (#262)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 54.6 (#40)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | 1440 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1475 |
| LMArena French | — | 1467 |
| LMArena German | — | 1456 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1405 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1416 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1457 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1447 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.7 (#272)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 75.0 (#80)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | 1420 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#260)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 43.7 (#84)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | 1430 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.8 (#277)
- Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent: 64.1 (#57)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | 1450 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | 1435 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | 1451 |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent is the stronger model overall, scoring 45.5 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent better for coding?

Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.4 versus 31.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.20 Multi-Agent has 20.