# DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Granite 3.1 2b Instruct

> Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.2 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-llm-67b-vs-granite-3-1-2b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 1 category and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Granite 3.1 2b Instruct leads 33.1 to 8.7.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 33.2 |
| Rank | 347 | 247 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | 1149 |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | 1138 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.5 | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1108 | 1159 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1131 |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | 1068 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1139 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1063 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | 1116 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | 1155 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | 1127 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | 1116 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | 1099 |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Granite 3.1 2b Instruct?

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.2 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better for coding?

Granite 3.1 2b Instruct scores higher on coding benchmarks: 33.4 versus 31.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12.