# DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Gemma 2 2b IT

> Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-llm-67b-vs-gemma-2-2b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 10

## Summary

- They share 10 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 0 categories and Gemma 2 2b IT in 8 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Gemma 2 2b IT leads 32.6 to 8.7.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Google |
| Noometry Index | 24.9 | 33.1 |
| Rank | 347 | 248 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.9 (#278)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | 1112 |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 16.5 (#304)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | 1113 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.5 | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.7 (#324)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1108 | 1135 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | — |
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.0 (#313)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | — |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1096 |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.4 (#267)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | 1132 |
| LMArena French | — | 1157 |
| LMArena German | — | 1114 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1055 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1140 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.4 (#277)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | 1118 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#265)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | 1130 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.6 (#282)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | 1156 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | 1147 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | 1118 |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Gemma 2 2b IT?

Gemma 2 2b IT is the stronger model overall, scoring 33.1 to 24.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Gemma 2 2b IT better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (31.9 vs 32.3); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Gemma 2 2b IT share?

10 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 2b IT has 17.