# DeepSeek LLM 67B vs Gemini 2.0 Pro

> Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-llm-67b-vs-gemini-2-0-pro
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 3

## Summary

- They share 3 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek LLM 67B scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 2.0 Pro in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Gemini 2.0 Pro leads 36.5 to 7.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is MATH Level 5: 6.4% for DeepSeek LLM 67B and 83.5% for Gemini 2.0 Pro.
- DeepSeek LLM 67B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Google |
| Noometry Index | 24.8 | 38.6 |
| Rank | 341 | 171 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.3 (#273)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.4 (#182)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Aider Polyglot | — | 35.6% |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 63.5% |
| LMArena Coding | 1096 | — |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 15.9 (#300)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 21.6 (#194)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 110.54 | 135.06 |
| Chess Puzzles | 0% | — |
| EnigmaEval | — | 0.7% |
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 60.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1070 | — |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 68% |
| LiveBench | — | 65.1% |

## Math

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 8.1 (#318)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 37.1 (#101)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| MATH Level 5 | 6.4% | 83.5% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | 0.8% | — |
| LiveBench Math | — | 71% |
| LMArena Math | 1108 | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 7.1 (#308)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 36.5 (#156)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | 24.6% | 65.7% |
| Confabulations | — | 18.4% |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 29.5 (#262)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1073 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1132 | — |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 55.7 (#272)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 75.6 (#57)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 83.4% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1079 | — |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 33.1 (#260)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 29.1 (#287)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 41.7% |
| LMArena Longer Query | 1092 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek LLM 67B: 31.8 (#277)
- Gemini 2.0 Pro: 52.7 (#164)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek LLM 67B | Gemini 2.0 Pro |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1105 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1067 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1082 | — |
| LiveBench Language | — | 44.9% |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek LLM 67B better than Gemini 2.0 Pro?

Gemini 2.0 Pro is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.6 to 24.8 on the Noometry Index.

### Is DeepSeek LLM 67B or Gemini 2.0 Pro better for coding?

Gemini 2.0 Pro scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.4 versus 31.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek LLM 67B and Gemini 2.0 Pro share?

3 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek LLM 67B has 15 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 2.0 Pro has 14.