# Deepseek Coder v2 vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

> Deepseek Coder v2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-v2-vs-qwen2-5-7b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher in 4 categories and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct in 2 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Deepseek Coder v2 leads 32.3 to 11.8.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 59.7% for Deepseek Coder v2 and 46.1% for Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.

## Snapshot

| | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 35.3 | 28.6 |
| Rank | 217 | 314 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.17 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Deepseek Coder v2: 37.5 (#178)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 35.9 (#204)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.2% | 37.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.7% | 46.1% |
| LMArena Coding | 1251 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 82.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 75.1% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Deepseek Coder v2: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.5 (#117)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 7.8% |

## Reasoning

- Deepseek Coder v2: 22.6 (#175)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.3 (#317)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1207 | — |
| DTBench | — | 47.7% |
| LMCA | — | 6.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 118.44 |
| WinoGrande | 83.7% | — |

## Math

- Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#188)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 11.8 (#300)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.5% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1241 | — |
| GSM8K | 94.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Deepseek Coder v2: 31.7 (#209)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#281)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 35.5% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 53.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 34.1% |
| LMArena Expert | 1181 | — |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 64.3% | — |
| MMLU | — | 72.9% |

## Multilingual

- Deepseek Coder v2: 36.4 (#235)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1182 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1201 | — |
| LMArena French | 1184 | — |
| LMArena German | 1164 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1126 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1104 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1188 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1153 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Deepseek Coder v2: 61.9 (#237)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.4 (#226)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 74.1% |
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1180 | — |

## Long Context

- Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#219)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: —

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Deepseek Coder v2: 38.4 (#249)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#194)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1191 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1120 | — |
| WildBench | — | 73.1% |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1176 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Deepseek Coder v2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 28.6 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Deepseek Coder v2 or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better for coding?

Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.5 versus 35.9 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.