# Deepseek Coder v2 vs Qwen1.5-110B

> Deepseek Coder v2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-v2-vs-qwen1-5-110b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 19

## Summary

- They share 19 benchmarks with published results for both. Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher in 8 categories and Qwen1.5-110B in 0 categories; 6 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Deepseek Coder v2 leads 38.1 to 33.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 59.7% for Deepseek Coder v2 and 44.4% for Qwen1.5-110B.

## Snapshot

| | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 34.2 |
| Rank | 220 | 234 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Deepseek Coder v2: 38.1 (#183)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.0 (#264)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.2% | 35% |
| LMArena Coding | 1251 | 1184 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.7% | 44.4% |
| HumanEval+ | 82.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 75.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Deepseek Coder v2: 23.6 (#176)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 22.7 (#189)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1207 | 1168 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.7 |
| WinoGrande | 83.7% | — |

## Math

- Deepseek Coder v2: 34.9 (#190)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.7 (#201)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1241 | 1185 |
| GSM8K | 94.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#212)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 31.2 (#219)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1181 | 1144 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 64.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Deepseek Coder v2: 36.3 (#240)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 33.6 (#250)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1182 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1201 | 1206 |
| LMArena French | 1185 | 1151 |
| LMArena German | 1164 | 1123 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1126 | 1074 |
| LMArena Korean | 1104 | 1044 |
| LMArena Russian | 1188 | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1153 | 1142 |

## Instruction Following

- Deepseek Coder v2: 61.7 (#242)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 60.3 (#252)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1180 | 1158 |

## Long Context

- Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#224)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 35.1 (#242)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1157 |

## Writing & Preference

- Deepseek Coder v2: 38.2 (#253)
- Qwen1.5-110B: 38.0 (#255)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen1.5-110B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1191 | 1175 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1120 | 1148 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1177 | 1160 |

## FAQ

### Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than Qwen1.5-110B?

Deepseek Coder v2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 34.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Deepseek Coder v2 or Qwen1.5-110B better for coding?

Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 33.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and Qwen1.5-110B share?

19 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen1.5-110B has 20.