# Deepseek Coder v2 vs Qwen Plus

> Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-v2-vs-qwen-plus
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 13

## Summary

- They share 13 benchmarks with published results for both. Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher in 2 categories and Qwen Plus in 6 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Qwen Plus leads 52.2 to 38.2.
- Deepseek Coder v2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 37.1 |
| Rank | 220 | 210 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.40 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Deepseek Coder v2: 38.1 (#183)
- Qwen Plus: 38.9 (#167)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1251 | 1328 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.7% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 82.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 75.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Deepseek Coder v2: 23.6 (#176)
- Qwen Plus: 28.4 (#107)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1207 | 1317 |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 63.3% |
| DTBench | — | 81.1% |
| LMCA | — | 24% |
| WinoGrande | 83.7% | — |

## Math

- Deepseek Coder v2: 34.9 (#190)
- Qwen Plus: 23.3 (#271)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1241 | 1326 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 17.8% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 65.3% |
| FrontierMath (Feb 2025 set) | — | 1.7% |
| GSM8K | 94.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#212)
- Qwen Plus: 27.4 (#251)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1181 | 1328 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 48.1% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 64.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Deepseek Coder v2: 36.3 (#240)
- Qwen Plus: 45.1 (#175)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1182 | 1310 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1201 | 1347 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1126 | 1251 |
| LMArena Russian | 1188 | 1323 |
| LMArena French | 1185 | — |
| LMArena German | 1164 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1104 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1153 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Deepseek Coder v2: 61.7 (#242)
- Qwen Plus: 68.8 (#181)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1180 | 1303 |

## Long Context

- Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#224)
- Qwen Plus: 40.3 (#158)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1324 |

## Writing & Preference

- Deepseek Coder v2: 38.2 (#253)
- Qwen Plus: 52.2 (#176)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Qwen Plus |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1191 | 1326 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1120 | 1293 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1177 | 1336 |

## FAQ

### Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than Qwen Plus?

Qwen Plus is the stronger model overall, scoring 37.1 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Deepseek Coder v2 or Qwen Plus better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (38.1 vs 38.9); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and Qwen Plus share?

13 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Plus has 20.