# Deepseek Coder v2 vs phi-3-medium 14B

> Deepseek Coder v2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-v2-vs-phi-3-medium-14b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher in 3 categories and phi-3-medium 14B in 0 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in knowledge, where Deepseek Coder v2 leads 31.7 to 9.1.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 59.7% for Deepseek Coder v2 and 48.7% for phi-3-medium 14B.

## Snapshot

| | Deepseek Coder v2 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Microsoft |
| Noometry Index | 35.3 | 29.1 |
| Rank | 217 | 306 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Deepseek Coder v2: 37.5 (#178)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 36.3 (#198)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.2% | 37.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.7% | 48.7% |
| LMArena Coding | 1251 | — |
| HumanEval+ | 82.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 75.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Deepseek Coder v2: 22.6 (#175)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| WinoGrande | 83.7% | 81.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1207 | — |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 55.8% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 81.4% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 121.18 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.4% |

## Math

- Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#188)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 25.2 (#249)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1241 | — |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 17.6% |
| GSM8K | 94.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Deepseek Coder v2: 31.7 (#209)
- phi-3-medium 14B: 9.1 (#301)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 64.3% | 91.6% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 27.6% |
| LMArena Expert | 1181 | — |
| MMLU | — | 78% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 87.4% |
| TriviaQA | — | 73.9% |

## Multilingual

- Deepseek Coder v2: 36.4 (#235)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1182 | — |
| LMArena Chinese | 1201 | — |
| LMArena French | 1184 | — |
| LMArena German | 1164 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1126 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1104 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1188 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1153 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Deepseek Coder v2: 61.9 (#237)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1180 | — |

## Long Context

- Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#219)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Deepseek Coder v2: 38.4 (#249)
- phi-3-medium 14B: —

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | phi-3-medium 14B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1191 | — |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1120 | — |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1176 | — |

## FAQ

### Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than phi-3-medium 14B?

Deepseek Coder v2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 29.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Deepseek Coder v2 or phi-3-medium 14B better for coding?

Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.5 versus 36.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and phi-3-medium 14B share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and phi-3-medium 14B has 13.