# Deepseek Coder v2 vs MiniMax-M2.1

> MiniMax-M2.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-v2-vs-minimax-m2-1
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher in 1 category and MiniMax-M2.1 in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax-M2.1 leads 58.3 to 38.2.

## Snapshot

| | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 38.9 |
| Rank | 220 | 178 |
| Context | — | 205K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $1.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Deepseek Coder v2: 38.1 (#183)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 40.4 (#143)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1251 | 1421 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1384 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.7% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 623.83 |
| HumanEval+ | 82.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 75.1% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Deepseek Coder v2: —
- MiniMax-M2.1: 27.9 (#98)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench | — | 36.6% |

## Reasoning

- Deepseek Coder v2: 23.6 (#176)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 16.6 (#302)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1207 | 1411 |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 11.2% |
| WinoGrande | 83.7% | — |

## Math

- Deepseek Coder v2: 34.9 (#190)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#138)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1241 | 1397 |
| GSM8K | 94.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#212)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 38.3 (#147)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1181 | 1431 |
| Vectara Hallucination Rate | — | 11.8% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 64.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Deepseek Coder v2: 36.3 (#240)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 50.0 (#128)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1182 | 1378 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1201 | 1430 |
| LMArena French | 1185 | 1404 |
| LMArena German | 1164 | 1381 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1126 | 1287 |
| LMArena Korean | 1104 | 1298 |
| LMArena Russian | 1188 | 1387 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1153 | 1397 |

## Instruction Following

- Deepseek Coder v2: 61.7 (#242)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 73.8 (#112)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1180 | 1400 |

## Long Context

- Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#224)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 43.2 (#101)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1416 |

## Writing & Preference

- Deepseek Coder v2: 38.2 (#253)
- MiniMax-M2.1: 58.3 (#120)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiniMax-M2.1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1191 | 1392 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1120 | 1361 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1177 | 1396 |

## FAQ

### Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than MiniMax-M2.1?

MiniMax-M2.1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 38.9 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Deepseek Coder v2 or MiniMax-M2.1 better for coding?

MiniMax-M2.1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.4 versus 38.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and MiniMax-M2.1 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax-M2.1 has 22.