# Deepseek Coder v2 vs MiniMax M1

> MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-v2-vs-minimax-m1
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher in 0 categories and MiniMax M1 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiniMax M1 leads 53.1 to 38.2.

## Snapshot

| | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | MiniMax |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 40.3 |
| Rank | 220 | 150 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.55 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.20 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Deepseek Coder v2: 38.1 (#183)
- MiniMax M1: 39.9 (#153)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1251 | 1359 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.7% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 82.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 75.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Deepseek Coder v2: 23.6 (#176)
- MiniMax M1: 26.9 (#126)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1207 | 1339 |
| WinoGrande | 83.7% | — |

## Math

- Deepseek Coder v2: 34.9 (#190)
- MiniMax M1: 37.5 (#151)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1241 | 1361 |
| GSM8K | 94.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#212)
- MiniMax M1: 36.4 (#170)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1181 | 1317 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 64.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Deepseek Coder v2: 36.3 (#240)
- MiniMax M1: 45.8 (#163)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1182 | 1319 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1201 | 1360 |
| LMArena French | 1185 | 1370 |
| LMArena German | 1164 | 1350 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1126 | 1217 |
| LMArena Korean | 1104 | 1266 |
| LMArena Russian | 1188 | 1329 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1153 | 1353 |

## Instruction Following

- Deepseek Coder v2: 61.7 (#242)
- MiniMax M1: 69.3 (#174)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1180 | 1312 |

## Long Context

- Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#224)
- MiniMax M1: 41.4 (#141)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1326 |
| Fiction.LiveBench | — | 69.4% |

## Writing & Preference

- Deepseek Coder v2: 38.2 (#253)
- MiniMax M1: 53.1 (#161)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiniMax M1 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1191 | 1343 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1120 | 1298 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1177 | 1335 |

## FAQ

### Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than MiniMax M1?

MiniMax M1 is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.3 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Deepseek Coder v2 or MiniMax M1 better for coding?

MiniMax M1 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 39.9 versus 38.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and MiniMax M1 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and MiniMax M1 has 18.