# Deepseek Coder v2 vs MiMo-V2.5

> MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-v2-vs-mimo-v2-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher in 0 categories and MiMo-V2.5 in 8 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where MiMo-V2.5 leads 61.6 to 38.2.

## Snapshot

| | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Xiaomi |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 43.4 |
| Rank | 220 | 93 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.14 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.28 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Deepseek Coder v2: 38.1 (#183)
- MiMo-V2.5: 43.9 (#81)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1251 | 1469 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1438 |
| SciCode | — | 43.1% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.7% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 513.95 |
| HumanEval+ | 82.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 75.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Deepseek Coder v2: 23.6 (#176)
- MiMo-V2.5: 28.6 (#101)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1207 | 1450 |
| CritPt | — | 3.7% |
| WinoGrande | 83.7% | — |

## Math

- Deepseek Coder v2: 34.9 (#190)
- MiMo-V2.5: 36.8 (#163)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1241 | 1436 |
| ProofBench | — | 16% |
| GSM8K | 94.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#212)
- MiMo-V2.5: 40.8 (#115)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1181 | 1460 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 64.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Deepseek Coder v2: —
- MiMo-V2.5: 39.8 (#54)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1247 |

## Multilingual

- Deepseek Coder v2: 36.3 (#240)
- MiMo-V2.5: 51.9 (#99)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1182 | 1404 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1201 | 1468 |
| LMArena French | 1185 | 1447 |
| LMArena German | 1164 | 1421 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1126 | 1306 |
| LMArena Korean | 1104 | 1363 |
| LMArena Russian | 1188 | 1395 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1153 | 1416 |

## Instruction Following

- Deepseek Coder v2: 61.7 (#242)
- MiMo-V2.5: 75.5 (#60)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1180 | 1434 |

## Long Context

- Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#224)
- MiMo-V2.5: 44.2 (#73)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1445 |

## Writing & Preference

- Deepseek Coder v2: 38.2 (#253)
- MiMo-V2.5: 61.6 (#86)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | MiMo-V2.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1191 | 1428 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1120 | 1393 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1177 | 1445 |

## FAQ

### Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than MiMo-V2.5?

MiMo-V2.5 is the stronger model overall, scoring 43.4 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Deepseek Coder v2 or MiMo-V2.5 better for coding?

MiMo-V2.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 43.9 versus 38.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and MiMo-V2.5 share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and MiMo-V2.5 has 23.