# Deepseek Coder v2 vs Llama 3-70B

> Deepseek Coder v2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-v2-vs-llama-3-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 22

## Summary

- They share 22 benchmarks with published results for both. Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 3-70B in 2 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in math, where Deepseek Coder v2 leads 32.3 to 12.0.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 59.7% for Deepseek Coder v2 and 54.5% for Llama 3-70B.

## Snapshot

| | Deepseek Coder v2 | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 35.3 | 28.5 |
| Rank | 217 | 317 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Deepseek Coder v2: 37.5 (#178)
- Llama 3-70B: 35.3 (#215)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.2% | 43.6% |
| LMArena Coding | 1251 | 1206 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.7% | 54.5% |
| HumanEval+ | 82.3% | 72% |
| MBPP+ | 75.1% | 69% |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Deepseek Coder v2: —
- Llama 3-70B: 20.9 (#132)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 5% |

## Reasoning

- Deepseek Coder v2: 22.6 (#175)
- Llama 3-70B: 17.4 (#284)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1207 | 1195 |
| WinoGrande | 83.7% | 83.5% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 35.1% |
| DTBench | — | 54.2% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 122.91 |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.1 |

## Math

- Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#188)
- Llama 3-70B: 12.0 (#299)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1241 | 1218 |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.3% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 22.6% |
| GSM8K | 94.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Deepseek Coder v2: 31.7 (#209)
- Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#272)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1181 | 1149 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 64.3% | — |
| MMLU | — | 79.3% |

## Multilingual

- Deepseek Coder v2: 36.4 (#235)
- Llama 3-70B: 33.8 (#246)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1182 | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1201 | 1114 |
| LMArena French | 1184 | 1231 |
| LMArena German | 1164 | 1169 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1126 | 1017 |
| LMArena Korean | 1104 | 1017 |
| LMArena Russian | 1188 | 1159 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1153 | 1241 |

## Instruction Following

- Deepseek Coder v2: 61.9 (#237)
- Llama 3-70B: 62.8 (#233)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1180 | 1194 |

## Long Context

- Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#219)
- Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#235)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1174 |

## Writing & Preference

- Deepseek Coder v2: 38.4 (#249)
- Llama 3-70B: 43.0 (#225)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1191 | 1221 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1120 | 1210 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1176 | 1223 |

## FAQ

### Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than Llama 3-70B?

Deepseek Coder v2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 28.5 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Deepseek Coder v2 or Llama 3-70B better for coding?

Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.5 versus 35.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and Llama 3-70B share?

22 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.