# Deepseek Coder v2 vs Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct

> Deepseek Coder v2 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (35.3 vs 35.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-v2-vs-llama-3-1-nemotron-51b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher in 6 categories and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct in 2 categories; 3 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct leads 43.5 to 38.4.

## Snapshot

| | Deepseek Coder v2 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | NVIDIA |
| Noometry Index | 35.3 | 35.2 |
| Rank | 217 | 219 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Deepseek Coder v2: 37.5 (#178)
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 35.0 (#219)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1251 | 1223 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.7% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 82.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 75.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Deepseek Coder v2: 22.6 (#175)
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 22.5 (#177)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1207 | 1204 |
| WinoGrande | 83.7% | — |

## Math

- Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#188)
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 32.0 (#189)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1241 | 1230 |
| GSM8K | 94.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Deepseek Coder v2: 31.7 (#209)
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 31.3 (#213)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1181 | 1167 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 64.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Deepseek Coder v2: 36.4 (#235)
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.3 (#236)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1182 | 1181 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1201 | 1179 |
| LMArena Russian | 1188 | 1186 |
| LMArena French | 1184 | — |
| LMArena German | 1164 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1126 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1104 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1153 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Deepseek Coder v2: 61.9 (#237)
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 63.2 (#228)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1180 | 1201 |

## Long Context

- Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#219)
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 36.5 (#225)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1205 |

## Writing & Preference

- Deepseek Coder v2: 38.4 (#249)
- Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct: 43.5 (#224)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1191 | 1228 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1120 | 1213 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1176 | 1227 |

## FAQ

### Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct?

Deepseek Coder v2 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct score almost the same on the Noometry Index (35.3 vs 35.2), so choose on price, context window or the category you care about most.

### Is Deepseek Coder v2 or Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct better for coding?

Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 37.5 versus 35.0 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3.1 Nemotron 51b Instruct has 12.