# Deepseek Coder v2 vs Granite 4.2 8B

> Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-v2-vs-granite-4-2-8b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 11

## Summary

- They share 11 benchmarks with published results for both. Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher in 0 categories and Granite 4.2 8B in 7 categories; 7 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Granite 4.2 8B leads 49.6 to 38.2.

## Snapshot

| | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 40.5 |
| Rank | 220 | 148 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.06 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.25 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Deepseek Coder v2: 38.1 (#183)
- Granite 4.2 8B: 40.5 (#137)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1251 | 1380 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.7% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 82.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 75.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Deepseek Coder v2: 23.6 (#176)
- Granite 4.2 8B: 26.6 (#131)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1207 | 1329 |
| WinoGrande | 83.7% | — |

## Math

- Deepseek Coder v2: 34.9 (#190)
- Granite 4.2 8B: —

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1241 | — |
| GSM8K | 94.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#212)
- Granite 4.2 8B: 38.4 (#145)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1181 | 1384 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 64.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Deepseek Coder v2: 36.3 (#240)
- Granite 4.2 8B: 44.5 (#178)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1182 | 1302 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1201 | 1366 |
| LMArena Russian | 1188 | 1285 |
| LMArena French | 1185 | — |
| LMArena German | 1164 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1126 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1104 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1153 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Deepseek Coder v2: 61.7 (#242)
- Granite 4.2 8B: 68.7 (#184)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1180 | 1301 |

## Long Context

- Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#224)
- Granite 4.2 8B: 40.3 (#159)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1324 |

## Writing & Preference

- Deepseek Coder v2: 38.2 (#253)
- Granite 4.2 8B: 49.6 (#189)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 4.2 8B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1191 | 1320 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1120 | 1236 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1177 | 1301 |

## FAQ

### Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than Granite 4.2 8B?

Granite 4.2 8B is the stronger model overall, scoring 40.5 to 35.9 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Deepseek Coder v2 or Granite 4.2 8B better for coding?

Granite 4.2 8B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 40.5 versus 38.1 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and Granite 4.2 8B share?

11 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Granite 4.2 8B has 11.