# Deepseek Coder v2 vs Granite 3.1 2b Instruct

> Deepseek Coder v2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-v2-vs-granite-3-1-2b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 12

## Summary

- They share 12 benchmarks with published results for both. Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher in 8 categories and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Deepseek Coder v2 leads 36.3 to 29.1.

## Snapshot

| | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | IBM |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 33.2 |
| Rank | 220 | 247 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Deepseek Coder v2: 38.1 (#183)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.4 (#257)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1251 | 1149 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.7% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 82.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 75.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Deepseek Coder v2: 23.6 (#176)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 22.0 (#209)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1207 | 1138 |
| WinoGrande | 83.7% | — |

## Math

- Deepseek Coder v2: 34.9 (#190)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 33.1 (#206)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1241 | 1159 |
| GSM8K | 94.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#212)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 30.8 (#224)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1181 | 1131 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 64.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Deepseek Coder v2: 36.3 (#240)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 29.1 (#269)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1182 | 1068 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1201 | 1139 |
| LMArena Russian | 1188 | 1063 |
| LMArena French | 1185 | — |
| LMArena German | 1164 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1126 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1104 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1153 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Deepseek Coder v2: 61.7 (#242)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 57.7 (#264)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1180 | 1116 |

## Long Context

- Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#224)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 35.0 (#244)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1155 |

## Writing & Preference

- Deepseek Coder v2: 38.2 (#253)
- Granite 3.1 2b Instruct: 34.1 (#274)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Granite 3.1 2b Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1191 | 1127 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1120 | 1116 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1177 | 1099 |

## FAQ

### Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than Granite 3.1 2b Instruct?

Deepseek Coder v2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 33.2 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Deepseek Coder v2 or Granite 3.1 2b Instruct better for coding?

Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 33.4 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct share?

12 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Granite 3.1 2b Instruct has 12.