# Deepseek Coder v2 vs Gemma 7B

> Deepseek Coder v2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-v2-vs-gemma-7b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 18

## Summary

- They share 18 benchmarks with published results for both. Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 7B in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Deepseek Coder v2 leads 38.2 to 27.1.

## Snapshot

| | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Google |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 30.0 |
| Rank | 220 | 299 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Deepseek Coder v2: 38.1 (#183)
- Gemma 7B: 30.5 (#294)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1251 | 1048 |
| HumanEval+ | 82.3% | 28.7% |
| MBPP+ | 75.1% | 43.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.7% | — |

## Reasoning

- Deepseek Coder v2: 23.6 (#176)
- Gemma 7B: 19.9 (#249)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1207 | 1042 |
| WinoGrande | 83.7% | 79% |
| Adversarial NLI | — | 48.7% |
| BIG-Bench Hard | — | 55.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 111.99 |
| HellaSwag | — | 82.2% |
| PIQA | — | 81.2% |

## Math

- Deepseek Coder v2: 34.9 (#190)
- Gemma 7B: 31.2 (#228)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1241 | 1066 |
| GSM8K | 94.5% | 46.4% |

## Knowledge

- Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#212)
- Gemma 7B: 27.3 (#252)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1181 | 1001 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 64.3% | 78.3% |
| BoolQ | — | 83.2% |
| MMLU | — | 66.1% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 78.6% |
| TriviaQA | — | 72.3% |

## Multilingual

- Deepseek Coder v2: 36.3 (#240)
- Gemma 7B: 25.1 (#287)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1182 | 999 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1201 | 1035 |
| LMArena French | 1185 | 1025 |
| LMArena Russian | 1188 | 993 |
| LMArena German | 1164 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1126 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1104 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1153 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Deepseek Coder v2: 61.7 (#242)
- Gemma 7B: 51.5 (#295)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1180 | 1017 |

## Long Context

- Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#224)
- Gemma 7B: 31.1 (#282)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1022 |

## Writing & Preference

- Deepseek Coder v2: 38.2 (#253)
- Gemma 7B: 27.1 (#302)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemma 7B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1191 | 1056 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1120 | 1024 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1177 | 963 |

## FAQ

### Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than Gemma 7B?

Deepseek Coder v2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 30.0 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Deepseek Coder v2 or Gemma 7B better for coding?

Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 30.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and Gemma 7B share?

18 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 7B has 27.