# Deepseek Coder v2 vs Gemma 2 2b IT

> Deepseek Coder v2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-v2-vs-gemma-2-2b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher in 8 categories and Gemma 2 2b IT in 0 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Deepseek Coder v2 leads 38.1 to 32.3.

## Snapshot

| | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Google |
| Noometry Index | 35.9 | 33.1 |
| Rank | 220 | 248 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Deepseek Coder v2: 38.1 (#183)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#273)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1251 | 1112 |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.7% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 82.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 75.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Deepseek Coder v2: 23.6 (#176)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 21.4 (#224)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1207 | 1113 |
| WinoGrande | 83.7% | — |

## Math

- Deepseek Coder v2: 34.9 (#190)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.6 (#212)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1241 | 1135 |
| GSM8K | 94.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#212)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.9 (#231)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1181 | 1096 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 64.3% | — |

## Multilingual

- Deepseek Coder v2: 36.3 (#240)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.3 (#257)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1182 | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1201 | 1132 |
| LMArena French | 1185 | 1157 |
| LMArena German | 1164 | 1114 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1126 | 1083 |
| LMArena Korean | 1104 | 1055 |
| LMArena Russian | 1188 | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1153 | 1140 |

## Instruction Following

- Deepseek Coder v2: 61.7 (#242)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 57.8 (#263)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1180 | 1118 |

## Long Context

- Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#224)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.3 (#250)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1130 |

## Writing & Preference

- Deepseek Coder v2: 38.2 (#253)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.5 (#263)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1191 | 1156 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1120 | 1147 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1177 | 1118 |

## FAQ

### Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than Gemma 2 2b IT?

Deepseek Coder v2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.9 to 33.1 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Deepseek Coder v2 or Gemma 2 2b IT better for coding?

Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.1 versus 32.3 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and Gemma 2 2b IT share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 2b IT has 17.