# Deepseek Coder v2 vs Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite

> Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 35.3 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-v2-vs-gemini-3-5-flash-lite
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 17

## Summary

- They share 17 benchmarks with published results for both. Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher in 1 category and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite in 7 categories; 8 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in writing & preference, where Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite leads 64.4 to 38.4.
- Deepseek Coder v2 has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Google |
| Noometry Index | 35.3 | 41.8 |
| Rank | 217 | 113 |
| Context | — | 1.05M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.30 |
| Output $/M | — | $2.50 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- Deepseek Coder v2: 37.5 (#178)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 42.1 (#96)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Coding | 1251 | 1455 |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1440 |
| SciCode | — | 41.3% |
| WeirdML | — | 39% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.2% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.7% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 765.27 |
| HumanEval+ | 82.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 75.1% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- Deepseek Coder v2: —
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 28.6 (#82)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| GDP.pdf | — | 10% |

## Reasoning

- Deepseek Coder v2: 22.6 (#175)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 27.8 (#95)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1207 | 1441 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 10.3% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 60.4% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 53.5% |
| CritPt | — | 0% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 22% |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 19% |
| DTBench | — | 83.5% |
| LMCA | — | 37.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 145.12 |
| WinoGrande | 83.7% | — |

## Math

- Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#188)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 25.7 (#245)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | 1241 | 1431 |
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 26% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 0% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 71.1% |
| ProofBench | — | 13% |
| GSM8K | 94.5% | — |

## Knowledge

- Deepseek Coder v2: 31.7 (#209)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 50.0 (#66)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | 1181 | 1430 |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 83.3% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 64.3% | — |

## Multimodal

- Deepseek Coder v2: —
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 40.3 (#38)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1266 |

## Multilingual

- Deepseek Coder v2: 36.4 (#235)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 53.8 (#59)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1182 | 1428 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1201 | 1467 |
| LMArena French | 1184 | 1452 |
| LMArena German | 1164 | 1454 |
| LMArena Japanese | 1126 | 1428 |
| LMArena Korean | 1104 | 1406 |
| LMArena Russian | 1188 | 1443 |
| LMArena Spanish | 1153 | 1440 |

## Instruction Following

- Deepseek Coder v2: 61.9 (#237)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 75.0 (#77)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1180 | 1420 |

## Long Context

- Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#219)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 43.8 (#80)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | 1435 |

## Writing & Preference

- Deepseek Coder v2: 38.4 (#249)
- Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite: 64.4 (#55)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1191 | 1436 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1120 | 1419 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1176 | 1445 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1559 |

## FAQ

### Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite is the stronger model overall, scoring 41.8 to 35.3 on the Noometry Index.

### Is Deepseek Coder v2 or Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite better for coding?

Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite scores higher on coding benchmarks: 42.1 versus 37.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite share?

17 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Gemini 3.5 Flash Lite has 38.