# Deepseek Coder v2 vs Falcon-180B

> Deepseek Coder v2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-v2-vs-falcon-180b
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 9

## Summary

- They share 9 benchmarks with published results for both. Deepseek Coder v2 scores higher in 4 categories and Falcon-180B in 0 categories; 4 gaps are clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in multilingual, where Deepseek Coder v2 leads 36.4 to 25.3.

## Snapshot

| | Deepseek Coder v2 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Technology Innovation Institute |
| Noometry Index | 35.3 | 31.8 |
| Rank | 217 | 254 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- Deepseek Coder v2: 37.5 (#178)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 48.2% | — |
| LMArena Coding | 1251 | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 59.7% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 82.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 75.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- Deepseek Coder v2: 22.6 (#175)
- Falcon-180B: 18.3 (#266)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | 1207 | 1007 |
| WinoGrande | 83.7% | 87.1% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | — | 111.89 |
| HellaSwag | — | 89% |
| LAMBADA | — | 79.8% |
| PIQA | — | 84.9% |

## Math

- Deepseek Coder v2: 32.3 (#188)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| GSM8K | 94.5% | 54.4% |
| LMArena Math | 1241 | — |

## Knowledge

- Deepseek Coder v2: 31.7 (#209)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 64.3% | 67.8% |
| LMArena Expert | 1181 | — |
| BoolQ | — | 89% |
| MMLU | — | 70.6% |
| OpenBookQA | — | 64.2% |

## Multilingual

- Deepseek Coder v2: 36.4 (#235)
- Falcon-180B: 25.3 (#281)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | 1182 | 1000 |
| LMArena Chinese | 1201 | — |
| LMArena French | 1184 | — |
| LMArena German | 1164 | — |
| LMArena Japanese | 1126 | — |
| LMArena Korean | 1104 | — |
| LMArena Russian | 1188 | — |
| LMArena Spanish | 1153 | — |

## Instruction Following

- Deepseek Coder v2: 61.9 (#237)
- Falcon-180B: 53.6 (#281)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | 1180 | 1047 |

## Long Context

- Deepseek Coder v2: 37.0 (#219)
- Falcon-180B: —

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | 1219 | — |

## Writing & Preference

- Deepseek Coder v2: 38.4 (#249)
- Falcon-180B: 29.3 (#290)

| Benchmark | Deepseek Coder v2 | Falcon-180B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | 1191 | 1054 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | 1120 | 1089 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | 1176 | 1013 |

## FAQ

### Is Deepseek Coder v2 better than Falcon-180B?

Deepseek Coder v2 is the stronger model overall, scoring 35.3 to 31.8 on the Noometry Index.

### How many benchmarks do Deepseek Coder v2 and Falcon-180B share?

9 benchmarks have published results for both models. Deepseek Coder v2 has 24 scored results on Noometry and Falcon-180B has 16.