# DeepSeek Coder 6.7B vs Qwen Turbo

> Qwen Turbo has enough public results to be ranked (#329); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-6-7b-vs-qwen-turbo
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 37.1 | 26.8 |
| Rank | — | 329 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.05 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.20 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: 35.2 (#216)
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35.5% | — |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 43.8% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 71.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 65.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Qwen Turbo: —

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 88.88 | — |
| WinoGrande | 57.6% | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Qwen Turbo: 14.5 (#291)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 6.1% |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 56.2% |
| GSM8K | 21.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Qwen Turbo: 22.2 (#267)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Qwen Turbo |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 41.8% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 36.4% | — |
| MMLU | 36.4% | — |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B better than Qwen Turbo?

Qwen Turbo has enough public results to be ranked (#329); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 6.7B and Qwen Turbo share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen Turbo has 3.
