# DeepSeek Coder 6.7B vs Llama 3-70B

> Llama 3-70B has enough public results to be ranked (#323); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-6-7b-vs-llama-3-70b
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 7

## Summary

- They share 7 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B scores higher in 0 categories and Llama 3-70B in 1 category, but none of those gaps is larger than the uncertainty.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 43.8% for DeepSeek Coder 6.7B and 54.5% for Llama 3-70B.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Meta |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 28.8 |
| Rank | — | 323 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: 35.8 (#219)
- Llama 3-70B: 35.8 (#218)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35.5% | 43.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 43.8% | 54.5% |
| HumanEval+ | 71.3% | 72% |
| MBPP+ | 65.6% | 69% |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1206 |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Llama 3-70B: 21.1 (#139)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Cybench | — | 5% |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Llama 3-70B: 18.0 (#288)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.62 | 122.93 |
| WinoGrande | 57.6% | 83.5% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 35.1% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1195 |
| DTBench | — | 54.2% |
| ForecastBench | — | 57.1 |

## Math

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Llama 3-70B: 12.8 (#305)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 4.3% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1218 |
| MATH Level 5 | — | 22.6% |
| GSM8K | 21.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Llama 3-70B: 20.8 (#277)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 36.4% | 79.3% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 40.6% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1149 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 36.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Llama 3-70B: 33.6 (#251)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1142 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1114 |
| LMArena French | — | 1232 |
| LMArena German | — | 1169 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1017 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1017 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1159 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1241 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Llama 3-70B: 62.5 (#238)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1194 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Llama 3-70B: 35.6 (#240)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1174 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Llama 3-70B: 42.8 (#231)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Llama 3-70B |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1221 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1210 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1223 |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B better than Llama 3-70B?

Llama 3-70B has enough public results to be ranked (#323); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B or Llama 3-70B better for coding?

They score almost the same on coding (35.8 vs 35.8); test both on your own repository before choosing.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 6.7B and Llama 3-70B share?

7 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Llama 3-70B has 31.