# DeepSeek Coder 6.7B vs Grok 4.6

> Grok 4.6 has enough public results to be ranked (#21); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-6-7b-vs-grok-4-6
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.6 in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Grok 4.6 leads 58.5 to 35.8.
- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 56.9 |
| Rank | — | 21 |
| Context | — | 500K |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: 35.8 (#219)
- Grok 4.6: 58.5 (#16)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 67.5% |
| FrontierCode | — | 48% |
| CursorBench | — | 41.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1617 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 25.3% |
| SciCode | — | 56.5% |
| WeirdML | — | 67.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1465 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 43.8% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,508 |
| HumanEval+ | 71.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 65.6% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Grok 4.6: 39.4 (#27)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 65.3% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 17.2% |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 9,047 |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Grok 4.6: 61.4 (#20)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.62 | 156.44 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 67.1% |
| SimpleBench | — | 75.9% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 80% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 87.5% |
| CritPt | — | 19.7% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 40% |
| EBR-Bench | — | 30.5% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1447 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 34% |
| DTBench | — | 97.3% |
| LMCA | — | 48.5% |
| WinoGrande | 57.6% | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Grok 4.6: 67.0 (#24)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 66% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 31.7% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 99.2% |
| ProofBench | — | 51% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1423 |
| GSM8K | 21.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Grok 4.6: 63.3 (#20)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 94% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 49.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1467 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 36.4% | — |
| MMLU | 36.4% | — |

## Multimodal

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Grok 4.6: 43.6 (#23)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1263 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 33.2% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 40% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1452 |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Grok 4.6: 53.0 (#74)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1420 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1480 |
| LMArena French | — | 1461 |
| LMArena German | — | 1431 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1376 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1397 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1422 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1404 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Grok 4.6: 75.4 (#63)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1431 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Grok 4.6: 44.5 (#66)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1454 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Grok 4.6: 62.3 (#80)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Grok 4.6 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1428 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1428 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1425 |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B better than Grok 4.6?

Grok 4.6 has enough public results to be ranked (#21); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B or Grok 4.6 better for coding?

Grok 4.6 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 58.5 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 6.7B and Grok 4.6 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.6 has 49.