# DeepSeek Coder 6.7B vs Grok 4.5

> Grok 4.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#22); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-6-7b-vs-grok-4-5
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B scores higher in 0 categories and Grok 4.5 in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where Grok 4.5 leads 51.7 to 35.2.
- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has downloadable open weights; the other is API-only.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | xAI |
| Noometry Index | 37.1 | 55.0 |
| Rank | — | 22 |
| Context | — | 500K |
| Input $/M | — | $2 |
| Output $/M | — | $6 |
| Weights | Open | Proprietary |

## Coding

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: 35.2 (#216)
- Grok 4.5: 51.7 (#34)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 53.8% |
| FrontierCode | — | 42.4% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1552 |
| SciCode | — | 54.1% |
| WeirdML | — | 46.4% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1473 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 43.8% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 1,309 |
| HumanEval+ | 71.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 65.6% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Grok 4.5: 44.4 (#15)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 56.2% |
| τ²-bench Banking | — | 47.9% |
| PostTrainBench | — | 23.4% |
| GBAEval | — | 65.4% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 14% |
| LMArena Search | — | 1213 |
| Vending-Bench 2 | — | 3,887 |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Grok 4.5: 56.0 (#23)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 88.88 | 154.02 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 52.6% |
| SimpleBench | — | 70% |
| Kagi LLM Benchmark | — | 83.5% |
| NYT Connections (extended) | — | 79.9% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 87.2% |
| CritPt | — | 15.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 36% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1462 |
| DTBench | — | 96.5% |
| LMCA | — | 45.2% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 74.4% |
| WinoGrande | 57.6% | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Grok 4.5: 60.7 (#29)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 57.2% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 24.4% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 97.8% |
| ProofBench | — | 31% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1457 |
| GSM8K | 21.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Grok 4.5: 62.3 (#21)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 93.4% |
| SimpleQA Verified | — | 48.3% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1466 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 36.4% | — |
| MMLU | 36.4% | — |

## Multimodal

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Grok 4.5: 37.8 (#63)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1287 |
| Blueprint-Bench 2 | — | 27.3% |
| Furniture Assembly | — | 22.5% |
| LMArena Document | — | 1452 |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Grok 4.5: 54.5 (#43)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1439 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1497 |
| LMArena French | — | 1458 |
| LMArena German | — | 1448 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1425 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1402 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1447 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1452 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Grok 4.5: 76.3 (#45)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1446 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Grok 4.5: 44.8 (#54)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1463 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Grok 4.5: 65.9 (#40)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Grok 4.5 |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1448 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1442 |
| EQ-Bench Creative Writing | — | 1579 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1457 |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B better than Grok 4.5?

Grok 4.5 has enough public results to be ranked (#22); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B or Grok 4.5 better for coding?

Grok 4.5 scores higher on coding benchmarks: 51.7 versus 35.2 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 6.7B and Grok 4.5 share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Grok 4.5 has 52.