# DeepSeek Coder 6.7B vs GLM-5.3-Flash

> GLM-5.3-Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#41); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-6-7b-vs-glm-5-3-flash
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 1

## Summary

- They share 1 benchmark with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B scores higher in 0 categories and GLM-5.3-Flash in 1 category; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where GLM-5.3-Flash leads 53.1 to 35.8.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Z.ai (Zhipu) |
| Noometry Index | 37.6 | 51.8 |
| Rank | — | 41 |
| Context | — | 1M |
| Input $/M | — | $0.15 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.50 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: 35.8 (#219)
- GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.1 (#31)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| DeepSWE | — | 63.4% |
| FrontierCode | — | 31.8% |
| CursorBench | — | 36.8% |
| LMArena WebDev | — | 1609 |
| FrontierSWE | — | 18.1% |
| SciCode | — | 51.6% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1508 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 43.8% | — |
| ALE-Bench | — | 303.55 |
| HumanEval+ | 71.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 65.6% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- GLM-5.3-Flash: 34.2 (#47)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| APEX-Agents | — | 52.8% |
| GDP.pdf | — | 14% |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- GLM-5.3-Flash: 48.0 (#42)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 89.62 | 151.88 |
| ARC-AGI-2 | — | 65.8% |
| ARC-AGI-1 | — | 91% |
| CritPt | — | 15.4% |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 14% |
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1491 |
| Mystery Game Puzzles | — | 8% |
| Surface Evolver Bench | — | 52.5% |
| Bench to the Future 3 | — | 0.15 |
| WinoGrande | 57.6% | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- GLM-5.3-Flash: 53.3 (#47)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| FrontierMath (Tiers 1-3) | — | 55.8% |
| FrontierMath Tier 4 | — | 17.1% |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 93.9% |
| ProofBench | — | 21% |
| LMArena Math | — | 1500 |
| GSM8K | 21.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- GLM-5.3-Flash: 58.4 (#36)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| GPQA Diamond | — | 90.2% |
| LMArena Expert | — | 1513 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 36.4% | — |
| MMLU | 36.4% | — |

## Multimodal

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- GLM-5.3-Flash: 42.8 (#27)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Vision | — | 1296 |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- GLM-5.3-Flash: 56.0 (#25)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1462 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1527 |
| LMArena French | — | 1496 |
| LMArena German | — | 1470 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1429 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1446 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1469 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1471 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- GLM-5.3-Flash: 77.5 (#20)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1478 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- GLM-5.3-Flash: 45.4 (#39)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1482 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- GLM-5.3-Flash: 65.3 (#50)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | GLM-5.3-Flash |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1471 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1442 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1467 |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B better than GLM-5.3-Flash?

GLM-5.3-Flash has enough public results to be ranked (#41); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B or GLM-5.3-Flash better for coding?

GLM-5.3-Flash scores higher on coding benchmarks: 53.1 versus 35.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 6.7B and GLM-5.3-Flash share?

1 benchmark has published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has 9 scored results on Noometry and GLM-5.3-Flash has 40.