# DeepSeek Coder 6.7B vs Gemma 2 2b IT

> Gemma 2 2b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#244); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-6-7b-vs-gemma-2-2b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek Coder 6.7B leads 35.2 to 31.8.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Google |
| Noometry Index | 37.1 | 32.5 |
| Rank | — | 244 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: 35.2 (#216)
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 31.8 (#268)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1112 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 43.8% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 71.3% | — |
| MBPP+ | 65.6% | — |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 20.5 (#219)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1113 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 88.88 | — |
| WinoGrande | 57.6% | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 30.1 (#212)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1135 |
| GSM8K | 21.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 29.3 (#229)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 1096 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 36.4% | — |
| MMLU | 36.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 32.5 (#252)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 1121 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1132 |
| LMArena French | — | 1156 |
| LMArena German | — | 1114 |
| LMArena Japanese | — | 1083 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 1055 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 1118 |
| LMArena Spanish | — | 1140 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 58.1 (#258)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 1118 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 34.2 (#245)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1130 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Gemma 2 2b IT: 36.6 (#258)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 2 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1156 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 1147 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 1118 |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B better than Gemma 2 2b IT?

Gemma 2 2b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#244); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B or Gemma 2 2b IT better for coding?

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 31.8 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 6.7B and Gemma 2 2b IT share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 2 2b IT has 17.