# DeepSeek Coder 6.7B vs Gemma 1.1 2b IT

> Gemma 1.1 2b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#313); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-6-7b-vs-gemma-1-1-2b-it
- Last updated: 2026-10-10
- Shared benchmarks: 2

## Summary

- They share 2 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B scores higher in 1 category and Gemma 1.1 2b IT in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek Coder 6.7B leads 35.2 to 29.6.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Google |
| Noometry Index | 37.1 | 28.8 |
| Rank | — | 313 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: 35.2 (#216)
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 29.6 (#294)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| HumanEval+ | 71.3% | 17.7% |
| MBPP+ | 65.6% | 23.3% |
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 35.5% | — |
| LMArena Coding | — | 1034 |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 43.8% | — |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 18.2 (#268)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Hard Prompts | — | 1005 |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 88.88 | — |
| WinoGrande | 57.6% | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 28.3 (#230)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Math | — | 1047 |
| GSM8K | 21.3% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 26.0 (#255)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Expert | — | 970 |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 36.4% | — |
| MMLU | 36.4% | — |

## Multilingual

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 24.7 (#284)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Non-English | — | 988 |
| LMArena Chinese | — | 1011 |
| LMArena German | — | 944 |
| LMArena Korean | — | 899 |
| LMArena Russian | — | 990 |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 50.1 (#294)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Instruction Following | — | 992 |

## Long Context

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 30.5 (#281)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Longer Query | — | 1003 |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek Coder 6.7B: —
- Gemma 1.1 2b IT: 25.3 (#301)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 6.7B | Gemma 1.1 2b IT |
|---|---|---|
| LMArena Text | — | 1022 |
| LMArena Creative Writing | — | 998 |
| LMArena Multi-Turn | — | 958 |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B better than Gemma 1.1 2b IT?

Gemma 1.1 2b IT has enough public results to be ranked (#313); DeepSeek Coder 6.7B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is DeepSeek Coder 6.7B or Gemma 1.1 2b IT better for coding?

DeepSeek Coder 6.7B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 35.2 versus 29.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 6.7B and Gemma 1.1 2b IT share?

2 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 6.7B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Gemma 1.1 2b IT has 16.