# DeepSeek Coder 33B vs Qwen2.5 7B Instruct

> Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#320); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-33b-vs-qwen2-5-7b-instruct
- Last updated: 2026-10-11
- Shared benchmarks: 4

## Summary

- They share 4 benchmarks with published results for both. DeepSeek Coder 33B scores higher in 1 category and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct in 0 categories; one gap is clear of the uncertainty.
- The biggest single-benchmark swing is BigCodeBench Complete: 51.1% for DeepSeek Coder 33B and 46.1% for Qwen2.5 7B Instruct.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Alibaba (Qwen) |
| Noometry Index | 38.9 | 29.0 |
| Rank | — | 320 |
| Context | — | 131K |
| Input $/M | — | $0.17 |
| Output $/M | — | $0.70 |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: 38.0 (#184)
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 36.5 (#208)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42% | 37.6% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 51.1% | 46.1% |
| HumanEval+ | 75% | — |
| MBPP+ | 70.1% | — |

## Agentic & Tool Use

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 23.8 (#124)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| BALROG | — | 7.8% |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 14.8 (#322)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 96.32 | 118.51 |
| Chess Puzzles | — | 0% |
| DTBench | — | 47.7% |
| LMCA | — | 6.4% |
| WinoGrande | 62% | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 12.6 (#306)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 | — | 2.5% |
| Omni-MATH | — | 29.4% |
| GSM8K | 35.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 17.0 (#286)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU | 39.4% | 72.9% |
| GPQA Diamond | — | 35.5% |
| MMLU-Pro | — | 53.9% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 34.1% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.2% | — |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 63.2 (#231)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| IFEval | — | 74.1% |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- Qwen2.5 7B Instruct: 48.8 (#195)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | Qwen2.5 7B Instruct |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | — | 73.1% |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek Coder 33B better than Qwen2.5 7B Instruct?

Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has enough public results to be ranked (#320); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is DeepSeek Coder 33B or Qwen2.5 7B Instruct better for coding?

DeepSeek Coder 33B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 36.5 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 33B and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct share?

4 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 33B has 9 scored results on Noometry and Qwen2.5 7B Instruct has 15.