# DeepSeek Coder 33B vs OLMo 2 Furious 13B

> OLMo 2 Furious 13B has enough public results to be ranked (#304); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

- Canonical page: https://noometry.com/compare/deepseek-coder-33b-vs-olmo-2-furious-13b
- Last updated: 2026-10-12
- Shared benchmarks: 0

## Summary

- The widest gap is in coding, where DeepSeek Coder 33B leads 38.0 to 28.6.

## Snapshot

| | DeepSeek Coder 33B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Provider | DeepSeek | Allen Institute for AI (Ai2) |
| Noometry Index | 38.9 | 29.7 |
| Rank | — | 304 |
| Context | — | — |
| Input $/M | — | — |
| Output $/M | — | — |
| Weights | Open | Open |

## Coding

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: 38.0 (#184)
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 28.6 (#313)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| BigCodeBench Instruct | 42% | — |
| LiveBench Coding | — | 10.4% |
| BigCodeBench Complete | 51.1% | — |
| HumanEval+ | 75% | — |
| MBPP+ | 70.1% | — |

## Reasoning

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 15.5 (#314)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Reasoning | — | 16.3% |
| LiveBench Data Analysis | — | 20.6% |
| Epoch Capabilities Index | 96.32 | — |
| LiveBench | — | 22.1% |
| WinoGrande | 62% | — |

## Math

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 23.1 (#273)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| Omni-MATH | — | 15.6% |
| LiveBench Math | — | 13.6% |
| GSM8K | 35.4% | — |

## Knowledge

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 18.3 (#283)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| MMLU-Pro | — | 31% |
| GPQA (HELM) | — | 31.6% |
| ARC (AI2) Challenge | 42.2% | — |
| MMLU | 39.4% | — |

## Instruction Following

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 60.9 (#248)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| LiveBench Instruction Following | — | 60.6% |
| IFEval | — | 73% |

## Writing & Preference

- DeepSeek Coder 33B: —
- OLMo 2 Furious 13B: 42.9 (#230)

| Benchmark | DeepSeek Coder 33B | OLMo 2 Furious 13B |
|---|---|---|
| WildBench | — | 68.9% |
| LiveBench Language | — | 11.2% |

## FAQ

### Is DeepSeek Coder 33B better than OLMo 2 Furious 13B?

OLMo 2 Furious 13B has enough public results to be ranked (#304); DeepSeek Coder 33B does not yet, so treat this comparison as directional.

### Is DeepSeek Coder 33B or OLMo 2 Furious 13B better for coding?

DeepSeek Coder 33B scores higher on coding benchmarks: 38.0 versus 28.6 in the Noometry coding category.

### How many benchmarks do DeepSeek Coder 33B and OLMo 2 Furious 13B share?

0 benchmarks have published results for both models. DeepSeek Coder 33B has 9 scored results on Noometry and OLMo 2 Furious 13B has 12.